Forum Topics
Female Performer Chat: Models saying no?
Tonight I saw something very strange. A model on her first night here told a member that she would not get naked in private. The member has a bra fetish so he asked if she would just show her bra in private and she said no. I thought this was very strange so I was wondering if anyone has ever seen anything like this before or has a story that can beat it? I hope this model the best but I don't know if she just didn't know what she was getting into when she signed up or if she was just confused being her first night.
As far as I know no model is obligated to go nude, up to each one and they obviously must have the good sense of making it pretty clear before someone taking her pvt and the chatter should ask as well before playing stupid and lose money.
Created by:
amanda_fucking_palmer
1/2/12 @ 9:10pm
(EST) |UTC - 5:00
Location: yeah baby ... i'm faking it again
Posts: 1,793
Mork, at times I find myself wondering if it is your first night on Flurtz 4 Frankincense as well. You know Mork, I know absolutely naught about your experiences with real life; but let me venture a guess here. You have heard girls say "NO!" to you repeatedly in your dizzying span of years. In fact, venturing a bit further here, almost all women say "No" to you in varying situations and in varying tones of politeness, eagerness, reticence and assertiveness. Perhaps you are accustomed to hearing:
"NO, we are out of pie today." or
"No, that is the wrong way to get to the treatment facility." or
"No, I won't do that, I have never done that with anyone, and I certainly am not going to do that with rubber gloves, wire coat hangers, peanut butter, duct tape and flying fucking squirrels."
Mork my dear semi-confused, and eager to get back to your Penthouse Forum Magazine, contributor to so many whimsical threads here... NO!
"NO, we are out of pie today." or
"No, that is the wrong way to get to the treatment facility." or
"No, I won't do that, I have never done that with anyone, and I certainly am not going to do that with rubber gloves, wire coat hangers, peanut butter, duct tape and flying fucking squirrels."
Mork my dear semi-confused, and eager to get back to your Penthouse Forum Magazine, contributor to so many whimsical threads here... NO!
Haha, your ad hominem attack against me is very funny! I was merely commenting on the fact that a new model joins a site based mainly around fantasies and sex and refuses to take off any clothes. As much as you would like to deny it this will seriously hurt her in making money!
As for girls telling me "no" in life, well that doesn't happen very often. I am a very nice person. Being a very nice person it has gotten me some very beautiful girlfriends throughout my life. Currently my very beautiful wife is 7,000 miles away from me so I can not talk to her except for at certain times so I come on here to talk to some nice people to help with my boredom and loneliness.
And I am sorry about your comments but "NO, we are out of pie today."; I don't eat pie, sorry. Maybe this was an attempt at making fun of me for being fat? Sorry, I weight 150 lbs. "No, that is the wrong way to get to the treatment facility."; This one is actually pretty offensive to make fun of anyone who needs medical help. I don't know if you were trying to refer to my physical or mental health but I am a disabled veteran and go to the hospital a few times a month for treatment, so it is low blow at me! "No, I won't do that, I have never done that with anyone, and I certainly am not going to do that with rubber gloves, wire coat hangers, peanut butter, duct tape and flying fucking squirrels."; is this an attempt to make fun of fetishes? I really don't understand this one, sorry.
I have never read Penthouse, and never will. I have some personal issue against Larry Flynt from years ago so by refusing to touch his magazine, or shop at his stores, it makes me feel better.
You totally avoided the point of my posting and decided an ad hominem was the right path. To the best of my understanding you have made fun of my weight (wrong), my mental or physical health, and I think assuming I have fetishes. Perhaps while you are at it you would like to come over and slash my tires, tear up the pics of my wife and kick my cats?
I was not telling any model to do anything she is uncomfortable with! If she is happy staying dressed and getting less privates that is her business. I have seen many threads here, posted about many topics, and I thought maybe someone else would find tonights situation funny (as I did) and have similar stories to share!
Thank you everyone for reading my rant, sorry if my thread offended anyone (not my intent) and happy 2012 to you all!
As for girls telling me "no" in life, well that doesn't happen very often. I am a very nice person. Being a very nice person it has gotten me some very beautiful girlfriends throughout my life. Currently my very beautiful wife is 7,000 miles away from me so I can not talk to her except for at certain times so I come on here to talk to some nice people to help with my boredom and loneliness.
And I am sorry about your comments but "NO, we are out of pie today."; I don't eat pie, sorry. Maybe this was an attempt at making fun of me for being fat? Sorry, I weight 150 lbs. "No, that is the wrong way to get to the treatment facility."; This one is actually pretty offensive to make fun of anyone who needs medical help. I don't know if you were trying to refer to my physical or mental health but I am a disabled veteran and go to the hospital a few times a month for treatment, so it is low blow at me! "No, I won't do that, I have never done that with anyone, and I certainly am not going to do that with rubber gloves, wire coat hangers, peanut butter, duct tape and flying fucking squirrels."; is this an attempt to make fun of fetishes? I really don't understand this one, sorry.
I have never read Penthouse, and never will. I have some personal issue against Larry Flynt from years ago so by refusing to touch his magazine, or shop at his stores, it makes me feel better.
You totally avoided the point of my posting and decided an ad hominem was the right path. To the best of my understanding you have made fun of my weight (wrong), my mental or physical health, and I think assuming I have fetishes. Perhaps while you are at it you would like to come over and slash my tires, tear up the pics of my wife and kick my cats?
I was not telling any model to do anything she is uncomfortable with! If she is happy staying dressed and getting less privates that is her business. I have seen many threads here, posted about many topics, and I thought maybe someone else would find tonights situation funny (as I did) and have similar stories to share!
Thank you everyone for reading my rant, sorry if my thread offended anyone (not my intent) and happy 2012 to you all!
Created by:
pavel467
1/2/12 @ 10:54pm
(EST) |UTC - 5:00
Location: "Taken into space...the final frontieer!"
Posts: 62
There are non-nude models on here. The ones I know get hour long plus pvts all the the time, and even on occasion, have made top 20 in promotional contests. Some even have their own thread
Not everyone comes here for the same thing.
Not everyone comes here for the same thing.
Created by:
grumpnose
1/2/12 @ 11:15pm
(EST) |UTC - 5:00
Location: where prince charming ruined all the fun
Posts: 691
While I agree with most of your posts on this topic Mork...you got penthouse confused with hustler.
Created by:
amanda_fucking_palmer
1/2/12 @ 11:23pm
(EST) |UTC - 5:00
Location: yeah baby ... i'm faking it again
Posts: 1,793
Haha, ad hominem
"NO, we are out of pie today."
"No, that is the wrong way to get to the treatment facility."
"No, I won't do that, I have never done that with anyone, and I certainly am not going to do that with rubber gloves, wire coat hangers, peanut butter, duct tape and flying fucking squirrels."
ad hominem
Latin for "to the man" or "to the person"
*giggles* *pats my black plumage into place* God I love those who are 'literal thinkers'
uhhuhhhhahahahahahahaaauuuuu
It looks like you went to Wikipedia to see what the definition of "ad hominem" is. Doing a search that is the only place I could find it as "to the man" or "to the person" (every other place had different wording). I suggest you continue to read the rest of the page, past the first sentence, and you will see you have committed an ad hominem. If you would like to continue attacking me about a thread I created intended for friendly converstion then may I suggest you send me an email through Flirt4Free? I think most people would appreciate this not having to use their time to read arguments.
While I agree with most of your posts on this topic Mork...you got penthouse confused with hustler.
Haha, yes, you are correct! Thank you! I do not like Hustler! I can not comment on Penthouse; I have never seen it.
Haha, yes, you are correct! Thank you! I do not like Hustler! I can not comment on Penthouse; I have never seen it.
Created by:
harlequin777
1/3/12 @ 1:09am
(EST) |UTC - 5:00
Location: the Noosphere...and I'm nonlocal and atemporal
Posts: 28
Ad hominem is a logical fallacy that tries to detract from a person's argument by bringing their character into question. It is a "red herring" of sorts and using it is a form of sophistry. It is also prevalent in eristic arguments. (Uh huh, I have experience with all of this...no wikipedia or google necessary.)
Personally, I am well familiar with the concept owing to studying some logic, and aeons ago I regularly attended net debate forums, clubs, and groups as a hobby (e.g. philosophy, religion, politics). The concept was brought up quite often (along with all the other logical fallacies). In fact I regularly had to cite "argumentum ad hominem" in defense of an argument when the other person diverged into personal attacks instead of addressing the issue at hand (usually with noobs).
My point? I was delighted and surprised to see the concept being used here, at a porn site. Who woulda thunk it? Hahaha!
Also, I think Amanda was being a tad facetious with her post to you, Mork.
p.s. NO!
{buckles belt even tighter}
p.p.s. I think "no" is the new "yes" for 2012... or something. I might have been misinformed by some malicious deviant.
p.p.p.s. Ad infinitum...
Personally, I am well familiar with the concept owing to studying some logic, and aeons ago I regularly attended net debate forums, clubs, and groups as a hobby (e.g. philosophy, religion, politics). The concept was brought up quite often (along with all the other logical fallacies). In fact I regularly had to cite "argumentum ad hominem" in defense of an argument when the other person diverged into personal attacks instead of addressing the issue at hand (usually with noobs).
My point? I was delighted and surprised to see the concept being used here, at a porn site. Who woulda thunk it? Hahaha!
Also, I think Amanda was being a tad facetious with her post to you, Mork.
p.s. NO!
{buckles belt even tighter}
p.p.s. I think "no" is the new "yes" for 2012... or something. I might have been misinformed by some malicious deviant.
p.p.p.s. Ad infinitum...
Ad hominem is a logical fallacy that tries to detract from a person's argument by bringing their character into question. It is a "red herring" of sorts and using it is a form of sophistry. It is also prevalent in eristic arguments. (Uh huh, I have experience with all of this...no wikipedia or google necessary.)
Personally, I am well familiar with the concept owing to studying some logic, and aeons ago I regularly attended net debate forums, clubs, and groups as a hobby (e.g. philosophy, religion, politics). The concept was brought up quite often (along with all the other logical fallacies). In fact I regularly had to cite "argumentum ad hominem" in defense of an argument when the other person diverged into personal attacks instead of addressing the issue at hand (usually with noobs).
My point? I was delighted and surprised to see the concept being used here, at a porn site. Who woulda thunk it? Hahaha!
Also, I think Amanda was being a tad facetious with her post to you, Mork.
p.s. NO!
{buckles belt even tighter}
p.p.s. I think "no" is the new "yes" for 2012... or something. I might gave been misinformed by some malicious deviant.
p.p.p.s. Ad infinitum...
Thanks for your reply! I have two Bachelor Degree's; one in Political Science, the other in Philosophy (with a min0r in Religious Studies). It is so rare that I get to use the Philosophy degree that I couldn't pass up the opportunity to nerd out!
p.s. You can't use the word min0r, my post got rejected for it, so I had to spell it with a 0!
Personally, I am well familiar with the concept owing to studying some logic, and aeons ago I regularly attended net debate forums, clubs, and groups as a hobby (e.g. philosophy, religion, politics). The concept was brought up quite often (along with all the other logical fallacies). In fact I regularly had to cite "argumentum ad hominem" in defense of an argument when the other person diverged into personal attacks instead of addressing the issue at hand (usually with noobs).
My point? I was delighted and surprised to see the concept being used here, at a porn site. Who woulda thunk it? Hahaha!
Also, I think Amanda was being a tad facetious with her post to you, Mork.
p.s. NO!
{buckles belt even tighter}
p.p.s. I think "no" is the new "yes" for 2012... or something. I might gave been misinformed by some malicious deviant.
p.p.p.s. Ad infinitum...
Thanks for your reply! I have two Bachelor Degree's; one in Political Science, the other in Philosophy (with a min0r in Religious Studies). It is so rare that I get to use the Philosophy degree that I couldn't pass up the opportunity to nerd out!
p.s. You can't use the word min0r, my post got rejected for it, so I had to spell it with a 0!
Tonight I saw something very strange. A model on her first night here told a member that she would not get naked in private. The member has a bra fetish so he asked if she would just show her bra in private and she said no. I thought this was very strange so I was wondering if anyone has ever seen anything like this before or has a story that can beat it? I hope this model the best but I don't know if she just didn't know what she was getting into when she signed up or if she was just confused being her first night.
Oh dear - I totally understand your idea. It also makes me think about situation like we had some time ago with male model posting here and asking something like "oh my God is it a gay webcam work????"
Other case is that it could be her first night - me for example, I told my studio very first night 3 years ago that I WOULD NEVA EVA took my panties off on cam. Oh well - I had my first private first day and got so turnt on that my panties almost fell down themselves Maybe it's just me, perv Loona 
3rd case - she has her customers just for her beauty and personality and being friend to them - and all are happy with no-nude girl on cam.
ps. and NO - Amanda is not in Xmass mood anymore
Oh dear - I totally understand your idea. It also makes me think about situation like we had some time ago with male model posting here and asking something like "oh my God is it a gay webcam work????"
Other case is that it could be her first night - me for example, I told my studio very first night 3 years ago that I WOULD NEVA EVA took my panties off on cam. Oh well - I had my first private first day and got so turnt on that my panties almost fell down themselves
Maybe it's just me, perv Loona 3rd case - she has her customers just for her beauty and personality and being friend to them - and all are happy with no-nude girl on cam.
ps. and NO - Amanda is not in Xmass mood anymore
Created by:
vinyage76guy
1/3/12 @ 7:30am
(EST) |UTC - 5:00
Location: Centurion, South Africa or lensflair.info
I agree with Pavel's post.. me and him both frequent a certain performers room and she is a non-nude model (and might I say it's gets terribly boring when she is away on her 3 hour privates)we like her room for all the fun we have there. As a matter of fact, I think I prefer non-nude model's rooms here because those models offer something different (and it's fun to make fun of the zombie greys with their rude requests :D)
Remember that models and performers here are people too and people have the right to make their own choices, and as a people yourself you are expected to respect their choices.
Remember that models and performers here are people too and people have the right to make their own choices, and as a people yourself you are expected to respect their choices.
Created by:
amanda_fucking_palmer
1/3/12 @ 10:14am
(EST) |UTC - 5:00
Location: yeah baby ... i'm faking it again
Posts: 1,793
Ad hominem is a logical fallacy that tries to detract from a person's argument by bringing their character into question. It is a "red herring" of sorts and using it is a form of sophistry. It is also prevalent in eristic arguments. (Uh huh, I have experience with all of this...no wikipedia or google necessary.)
Personally, I am well familiar with the concept owing to studying some logic, and aeons ago I regularly attended net debate forums, clubs, and groups as a hobby (e.g. philosophy, religion, politics). The concept was brought up quite often (along with all the other logical fallacies). In fact I regularly had to cite "argumentum ad hominem" in defense of an argument when the other person diverged into personal attacks instead of addressing the issue at hand (usually with noobs).
My point? I was delighted and surprised to see the concept being used here, at a porn site. Who woulda thunk it? Hahaha!
Also, I think Amanda was being a tad facetious with her post to you, Mork.
p.s. NO!
{buckles belt even tighter}
p.p.s. I think "no" is the new "yes" for 2012... or something. I might have been misinformed by some malicious deviant.
p.p.p.s. Ad infinitum...
my darling *sigh* thank you for pointing out to the rather confused among us that i was just 'following along in literalness' with MorkDork's rampaging about "to the man"' when he used, the rather slighting of Latin, ad hominem omitting the clarity of a logical and well presented argumentum.
i was so very amused to see him throwing men about the thread. god help us if grumpnose reads this one and starts muttering about males adverting their genitalia eh? *giggles at Mork's prancing all the lovely ladies and his beautiful and remote wife (air valve fully intact of course) in to offer testimonials to his 'full fitness'* oh goddesses, there i go offering some imaginary slight to inflatable fetishists.
(sulks) that all i ever did as an 'arguer' of note was wave a strap-on in the face of an entire generation of submissive males and, for a brief period in my youth, taunt and thrash a largish membership population of white witch wiccans on AOL (giggles)
*saunters off to soak in my deliciously warm tub of bubbly rejection*
(giggles)(kisses)(embraces)
"Oh, NO! Noooo my Harlequin no my love no not again... no.. not there.. no ... nooooo.. ummmm .. no no no no NOOO NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO" (pleasure.with.pain) (no.lust.lust)
Personally, I am well familiar with the concept owing to studying some logic, and aeons ago I regularly attended net debate forums, clubs, and groups as a hobby (e.g. philosophy, religion, politics). The concept was brought up quite often (along with all the other logical fallacies). In fact I regularly had to cite "argumentum ad hominem" in defense of an argument when the other person diverged into personal attacks instead of addressing the issue at hand (usually with noobs).
My point? I was delighted and surprised to see the concept being used here, at a porn site. Who woulda thunk it? Hahaha!
Also, I think Amanda was being a tad facetious with her post to you, Mork.
p.s. NO!
{buckles belt even tighter}
p.p.s. I think "no" is the new "yes" for 2012... or something. I might have been misinformed by some malicious deviant.
p.p.p.s. Ad infinitum...
my darling *sigh* thank you for pointing out to the rather confused among us that i was just 'following along in literalness' with MorkDork's rampaging about "to the man"' when he used, the rather slighting of Latin, ad hominem omitting the clarity of a logical and well presented argumentum.
i was so very amused to see him throwing men about the thread. god help us if grumpnose reads this one and starts muttering about males adverting their genitalia eh? *giggles at Mork's prancing all the lovely ladies and his beautiful and remote wife (air valve fully intact of course) in to offer testimonials to his 'full fitness'* oh goddesses, there i go offering some imaginary slight to inflatable fetishists.
(sulks) that all i ever did as an 'arguer' of note was wave a strap-on in the face of an entire generation of submissive males and, for a brief period in my youth, taunt and thrash a largish membership population of white witch wiccans on AOL (giggles)
*saunters off to soak in my deliciously warm tub of bubbly rejection*
(giggles)(kisses)(embraces)
"Oh, NO! Noooo my Harlequin no my love no not again... no.. not there.. no ... nooooo.. ummmm .. no no no no NOOO NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO" (pleasure.with.pain) (no.lust.lust)
Created by:
amanda_fucking_palmer
1/3/12 @ 10:37am
(EST) |UTC - 5:00
Location: yeah baby ... i'm faking it again
Posts: 1,793
It looks like you went to Wikipedia to see what the definition of "ad hominem" is. Doing a search that is the only place I could find it as "to the man" or "to the person" (every other place had different wording). I suggest you continue to read the rest of the page, past the first sentence, and you will see you have committed an ad hominem. If you would like to continue attacking me about a thread I created intended for friendly converstion then may I suggest you send me an email through Flirt4Free? I think most people would appreciate this not having to use their time to read arguments.
why yes MorkDork i did use my lusting loving tender hotness Wilipedia to examine closely what you inserted (rather unimpressive) and what you omitted (that final critical bit which does do 'that thing' to a girl) see post above to my darling Harlequin for more on that. I do lust my Wiki (additional reference to my and Harlequin's on-going sexting of each others brains). alas *sigh* i find myself with oodles of hours available to me to do my sultry danse avec les mots ... and loving my OWN as much as i do let me re-scribe my adoration and wetness over Wiki's way with me ... for you only (all others must put the blindfolds on and promise not to look ... ignore the noise of the blade in the air while you do eh?) a much earlier me writing of my wikilust
Lust for My Wikipedia Links
(pink.lipstick)(corset)
(sex.approach)(force.it)
(mascara.lipgloss)
(not.accept)(loss)
(love)(me)(wiki)(sex.me)(please)
Mmmm (wiki.tits)
Mmmm (wiki.c'unt.yum)
Ohhh (wiki.you.cum)
(love)(wiki)(hearts)(flowers)
(blend.wiki)(my.power)
Amanda 2011
3/14/2011
OH dear NO Mork ... THERE at LAST a proper use of the word Mork NO, firstly, customer to customer Fmales do not occur no no no no no no.. nope.. nyet nil not allowed no promotion no advancement...
secondly omg, people simply ADORE me making an ass of myself in public ... did you miss the memo?
NO NON NON nyet yet again!!!!!! uuuhhhuuuahahahahahahahauuu (kisses.my.darling.lover) who owns that eerie frenchman's laugh
why yes MorkDork i did use my lusting loving tender hotness Wilipedia to examine closely what you inserted (rather unimpressive) and what you omitted (that final critical bit which does do 'that thing' to a girl) see post above to my darling Harlequin for more on that. I do lust my Wiki (additional reference to my and Harlequin's on-going sexting of each others brains). alas *sigh* i find myself with oodles of hours available to me to do my sultry danse avec les mots ... and loving my OWN as much as i do let me re-scribe my adoration and wetness over Wiki's way with me ... for you only (all others must put the blindfolds on and promise not to look ... ignore the noise of the blade in the air while you do eh?) a much earlier me writing of my wikilust
Lust for My Wikipedia Links
(pink.lipstick)(corset)
(sex.approach)(force.it)
(mascara.lipgloss)
(not.accept)(loss)
(love)(me)(wiki)(sex.me)(please)
Mmmm (wiki.tits)
Mmmm (wiki.c'unt.yum)
Ohhh (wiki.you.cum)
(love)(wiki)(hearts)(flowers)
(blend.wiki)(my.power)
Amanda 2011
3/14/2011
OH dear NO Mork ... THERE at LAST a proper use of the word Mork NO, firstly, customer to customer Fmales do not occur no no no no no no.. nope.. nyet nil not allowed no promotion no advancement...
secondly omg, people simply ADORE me making an ass of myself in public ... did you miss the memo?
NO NON NON nyet yet again!!!!!! uuuhhhuuuahahahahahahahauuu (kisses.my.darling.lover) who owns that eerie frenchman's laugh
Created by:
suggs
1/3/12 @ 2:30pm
(EST) |UTC - 5:00
Location: Left of centre
Posts: 6,768
secondly omg, people simply ADORE me making an ass of myself in public ... did you miss the memo?
whereas some of us just ADORE ya ass - chases after you as Yakety Sax plays in my head...
Created by:
harlequin777
1/3/12 @ 2:44pm
(EST) |UTC - 5:00
Location: the Noosphere...and I'm nonlocal and atemporal
Posts: 28
...chases after you as Yakety Sax plays in my head
Oh no...images of a debauched Benny Hill and his bald, geriatric sidekick chasing nubile girls are locked in my head!
{holds hands to side of head...closes eyes}
Make the meme stop!
Lalalalala...
LOL
Good one.
Created by:
harlequin777
1/3/12 @ 2:48pm
(EST) |UTC - 5:00
Location: the Noosphere...and I'm nonlocal and atemporal
Posts: 28
Thanks for your reply! I have two Bachelor Degree's; one in Political Science, the other in Philosophy (with a min0r in Religious Studies). It is so rare that I get to use the Philosophy degree that I couldn't pass up the opportunity to nerd out!
You're welcome.
Nerdom rules!
(Said proudly by one nerd to another.)
